The case of Luigi Mangione, accused of assassinating United Health Care CEO Brian Thompson, has ignited a national debate, highlighting the complex interplay between media portrayal, public perception and the legal systems. The case raises questions about whether his actions, while severe, should be classified as terrorism. Some argue that calling Mangione a terrorist is simply a way to protect corporate interests and silence criticism of the healthcare industry. Meanwhile, his portrayal varies drastically: mainstream media paints him as a dangerous criminal, while social media platforms like TikTok frame him as an antihero fighting against systemic injustice.
“The way these platforms portray events can really shape public perception differently,” said Carla Jurgensmeyer, AP psychology teacher.
Mangione, a 26-year-old graduate of University of Pennsylvania, stands charged with first degree murder in furtherance of terrorism, among other offenses. According to CBS News, prosecutors allege that on Dec. 4, 2024, he fatally shot Thompson outside a Manhattan hotel. The invocation of post 9/11 anti-terrorism law, typically reserved for acts intended to intimidate or coerce civilians or influence government policy, has raised eyebrows, especially considering that Mangione’s alleged actions targeted a single individual without causing harm to the public.
“From a psychological standpoint, understanding his motives—what was driving him—would be key in determining whether terrorism charges would stick,” said Jurgensmeyer.
Mainstream media outlets have largely depicted Mangione as a dangerous criminal. Headlines emphasize the premeditated nature of the crime, his alleged anti-corporate sentiments, and the potential implications of labeling such an act of terrorism. This narrative aligns with law enforcement’s stance, underscoring the severity of the charges and the need for stringent legal measures.
“I believe news outlets and social media are viewing this very differently than people and portraying it as a very unjust thing,” said Arianna Cordero, 12.
In contrast, platforms like TikTok have witnessed a surge of content portraying Mangione as an antihero. Users share videos and posts that frame his alleged actions as a stand against perceived injustices within the healthcare system. This sentiment is bolstered by public opinion polls indicating that a significant portion of Americans attribute some responsibility for Thompson’s death to systemic issues in the healthcare insurance industry, including claim denials and corporate profits.
The dichotomy in Mangione’s portrayal reflects broader societal frustrations with the U.S. healthcare systems. As his trial approaches, concerns about his ability to receive a fair trial have been raised, given the polarized public opinion and extensive media coverage. His defense attorney has criticized the public exposure during Mangione’s “perp walk,” arguing it jeopardized his right to a fair trial.
The Mangione case serves as a focal point for discussion on healthcare reform, media influence, and the complexities of the legal system in addressing acts that straddle the line between criminality and perceived social justice. Ultimately, branding him a terrorist may be less about justice and more about shielding powerful corporations from accountability.
“I believe the Luigi Mangione case is just the beginning for more to come. America is in a tough spot right now because of this situation, and I believe this is causing people to open their eyes about corruption in the U.S.,” said Cordero, 12.
